Logo chicago blackhawks

The color schemes are most notably what changed throughout the years. The patch was worn in in honor of long time owner William Wadsworth Wirtz. This patch was worn to commemorate the th Anniversary of the United States of America. First worn on January 17, Also, the fact that the Blackhawks were named after a Army division helps to argue that there is no racist intent. The Blackhawks organization has come a long way since the coffee tycoon created the team in Sign in.

Password recovery. Sports Mockery. The Chicago Tribune reported on the birth of the team back in Aug. Uniforms will be symbolic of the name. After deciding on a team name with ties to his service in the military, McLaughlin had to choose a logo.

He picked the side profile of a Native American. In , the Blackhawks initiated yet another logo redesign which, save for some variations in outlines and shading, brings us to the present day. As you can see, the many elements of the always-complicated Chicago crest, such as the features of the face and the outline of the feathers, have been nicely cleaned up, producing a more standardised, appealing side profile of Black Hawk. The neutral expression has been retained and, with the softened features of the face, Black Hawk again, assuming the logo is supposed to represent him has a look that is stoic, and yet almost…kind.

You think the primary logo has gone through a lot of iterations? On their red jerseys, the Blackhawks sport a Tomahawk Cross crest that has a yellow C, overlaid with two tomahawks with green handles and white heads. On their white jerseys, the Tomahawk Cross has a yellow C, with the two tomahawks having red handles and green heads. Think about it. Imagine the original red, black and white patch on the shoulders of those glorious red, black and white jerseys.

A bit bland, a bit boring; washed-out, if you will. From , the Blackhawks wore their jerseys from the Winter Classic as their alternate kits. The Tomahawk Cross patch they selected harkened back to one of the very first iterations of the crest, save for the substitution of tan for white on the shafts of the tomahawks, in accordance with the rest of the jersey. Many sporting teams make use of Aboriginal names and iconography, and most, if not all, are under scrutiny for it.

There is increasing willingness amongst governments, individuals and other concerned groups to delve into the tumultuous, often-shameful historical relations with Aboriginal communities. Thus, conditions are ripe for a discussion over what we want our sports teams to represent. It seems as though any representation of Aboriginals within the context of sports is increasingly seen as automatically offensive.

But there are other teams that style themselves after specific ethnic groups, without being subjected to controversy. We should be wary of painting things with too broad a brush. At the same time, we should not refuse to acknowledge that such a brush exists at all.

When you consider a team like the Cleveland Indians, you can certainly understand where complainants are coming from.

Why stick so stubbornly to the Indians name and logo? Why not just consult with local Aboriginal groups and figure out a historic, Aboriginal-themed name palatable for both sides of the issue? The Washington Redskins are another team with blatantly inappropriate branding.

And as for the team name? Blackskins, Whiteskins and Yellowskins would all be grossly inappropriate. So why is Redskins allowed to stand? A franchise straddling the line of good taste is the Atlanta Braves. A brave is a warrior of an Aboriginal American group. The current logo is a tomahawk, a traditional tool and weapon of such groups.